Publication | Closed Access
Exploring the Determinants of Support Provision: Provider Characteristics, Personal Networks, Community Contexts, and Support Following Life Events
186
Citations
35
References
1996
Year
Independent LivingEducationSocial SupportSocial SciencesHurricane AndrewCommunity ResilienceLifestyle SupportProvider CharacteristicsCommunity AttachmentSupport SystemsHousingPublic PolicyPatient SupportDisaster VulnerabilityCommunity EngagementSocial ImpactDisaster ResponseSupport ProvisionApplied Social PsychologyCommunity ContextsCommunity DevelopmentDisaster ManagementSociologyDisaster ResearchLong-term CareCrisis ManagementDisaster Risk Reduction
The study investigates how provider characteristics, personal networks, and community contexts influence support provision during natural disasters, developing and testing a model based on House (1981) across Hurricane Andrew’s preparation and recovery phases. The authors constructed a model that links provider traits, network density, and community attachment to the ability to provide support, following House’s framework. All three factor sets affected support provision, with age, income, network density, and local economy driving the preparation phase, while religion, house damage, network size/diversity, and community bonds and sentiments shaped short‑term recovery.
To explore the determinants of support provision in the natural disaster context, we followed House (1981) and developed a model that specifies how characteristics of the providers, their personal networks, and the community contexts in which they live facilitate or impede their ability to provide support. All three sets of factors affected support provision during Hurricane Andrew, but the pattern of effects differs for the preparation and short-term recovery phases of the hurricane. Age, income, network density, and local economic conditions had significant effects on support provision in the preparation phase. Income did not have a significant effect on short-term recovery support, but religion, house damage, the size and diversity dimensions of network structure, and the local bonds and sentiments dimensions of community attachment did. After comparing the explanatory power of our model in the two phases, we conclude by investigating the implications of this test for understanding the determinants of support provision more generally.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1