University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · 2015 · 15 citations · 15 references
Open access
Life SciencesGeneticsMolecular GeneticsGenomicsMedical GeneticsMolecular DiagnosticsClinical GenomicsDna SequencingInherited Disease TestingVariant AnalysisVariant DetectionVariant InterpretationClinical Assay DevelopmentClinical Genetic DiagnosisClinical Genomic DiagnosticsClinical Next-generation SequencingClinical Variant ReportingDiagnostic GenomicsInherited Disease DiagnosisInherited Disease Genetics
Increasing clinical interest and decreasing sequencing costs are driving the wider \nimplementation of clinical next generation sequencing assays for the diagnosis of \ninherited disease, including among a growing number of small to medium sized clinical \nlaboratories. Therefore, an optimal combination of cost-effectiveness and clinical \nspecificity is required to continue this broad adoption of genomic technology for clinical \ndiagnosis. Sanger confirmation of all NGS variants is a common practice that increases \nboth cost and turnaround time for clinical reporting. We reviewed 300 cases of Sanger \nverified NGS results as well as 60 suspected (and subsequently confirmed) artifacts, \nand developed a set of multiple criteria to report NGS variants without Sanger \nverification with 100% accuracy. Using these criteria, we project greater than 80% of \nclinically reported variants could be confidently released without Sanger confirmation.
15
A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data
Mark A. DePristo, Eric Banks, Ryan Poplin et al. · Nature Genetics · 2011 · 12.4K citations · Full text
Molecular Findings Among Patients Referred for Clinical Whole-Exome Sequencing
Yaping Yang, Donna M. Muzny, Fan Xia et al. · JAMA · 2014 · 1.4K citations