Journal of Bone Metabolism · 2015 · 26 citations · 13 references
MedicineNutritionBioavailabilityBiopharmaceuticsMicronutrient DeficiencyBioanalytical Method ValidationVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitamin D DisordersVitamin D MetabolismHormone ImmunoassaysReference Value ValidationSerum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D StatusStandard Reference MaterialsVitamin D AssessmentVitamin D BiomarkersVitamin D MetabolitesVitamin D Status Biomarkers
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to find out the cause of discrepancy between various automated immunoassays for 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-[OH]D). METHODS: National Institute of Standards & Technology Standard Reference Material (SRM) 972a is SRM for 25-(OH)D and consists of 4 vials of frozen serum with different concentrations of 25-(OH)D. Each concentration was measured 6 times in 3 different immunoassays: ADVIA Vitamin D Total assay (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), ARCHITECT 25-(OH)D (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA), and COBAS Vitamin D Total assay (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). RESULTS: When using the certified reference values of SRM 972a as it is, discarding the cross-reactivity of each immunoassay, for ADVIA, the coefficient of determination (R(2)) as a score of regression analysis was 0.8995 and maximal difference between measured value and certified reference value was 3.6 ng/mL in level 3. The R(2) and maximal differences of ARCHITECT were 0.5377 and 6.9 ng/mL, respectively, in level 4. Those of COBAS were 0.3674 and 22.3 ng/mL, respectively, in level 4. When considering cross-reactivities of each immunoassays to various 25-(OH)D metabolites, the ADVIA had R(2) and maximal difference of 0.9254 and 3.3 ng/mL, respectively, in level 3. For ARCHITECT, the R(2) and maximal differences were 0.7602 and 5.1 ng/mL, respectively, in level 1. Those of COBAS were 0.9284 and 4.9 ng/mL, respectively, in level 1. CONCLUSIONS: The cause of discrepancies between vitamin D immunoassays was mainly on the difference in cross-reactivities to various vitamin D metabolites. The discrepancies can be considerably decreased by considering cross-reactivities of each immunoassay.
13
Ravinder J. Singh, Robert L. Taylor, G. Satyanarayana Reddy et al. · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2006 · 475 citations · Full text
Christopher-John L Farrell, Steven Martin, Brett McWhinney et al. · Clinical Chemistry · 2012 · 373 citations · Full text
Susan S.-C. Tai, Mary Bedner, Karen W. Phinney · Analytical Chemistry · 2010 · 268 citations · Full text
The Role of Vitamin D in the Aging Adult
M. J. M. Meehan, Sue Penckofer · Journal of Aging and Gerontology · 2014 · 183 citations · Full text