BioMed Research International · 2016 · 114 citations · 39 references
DentistryMicrobiologyPeriodonticsAntimicrobial PharmacotherapyMedical MicrobiologyOral MicrobiologyAntimicrobial Susceptibility TestingAntimicrobial TherapyMicrobiological AnalysisAgar DilutionAntimicrobial Efficacy TestingMinimum Bactericidal ConcentrationOral Biofilm InhibitionOral Pathogenic MicroorganismsPrevotella IntermediaPrevotella SpeciesStreptococcus Sobrinus
This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans, and their single-species biofilms by agar dilution and broth microdilution test methods. Both agents inhibited the growth of all planktonic species. On the other hand, CHX exhibited lower minimum bactericidal concentrations than EEP against biofilms of A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. aureus, and E. faecalis whereas EEP yielded a better result against Lactobacilli and P. intermedia. The bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations of both agents were found to be equal against biofilms of Streptecocci, P. gingivalis, A. israelii, and C. albicans. The results of this study revealed that propolis was more effective in inhibiting Gram-positive bacteria than the Gram-negative bacteria in their planktonic state and it was suggested that EEP could be as effective as CHX on oral microorganisms in their biofilm state.
39
Seasonal effect on Brazilian propolis antibacterial activity
José Maurício Sforcin, C. A. Lopes, Vassya Bankova et al. · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · 2000 · 503 citations