National Studies as a Component of the World Health Organization Initiative to Estimate the Global and Regional Burden of Foodborne Disease

Robin Lake, Brecht Devleesschauwer, George William Nasinyama, Arie H. Havelaar, Tanja Kuchenmüller, Juanita A. Haagsma, Helen H. Jensen, Nasreen Jessani, Charline Maertens de Noordhout, Frederick J. Angulo,

PLoS ONE · 2015 · 23 citations · 7 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

WHO’s 2007 FERG initiative was created to estimate global foodborne disease burden and promote national action, but data gaps and the need for specialist expertise hinder effective risk communication and policy development. This paper outlines the process and lessons learned from conducting pilot country studies under the WHO FERG initiative. The FERG Country Studies Task Force built capacity by developing tools and resources for national burden studies and encouraging the use of burden data in evidence‑informed policy, with brief descriptions of each study provided. Pilot studies were launched in Albania, Japan, Thailand (2011) and Uganda (2012), and the resulting FERG estimates are expected to help countries close data gaps and support disease‑burden reduction efforts.

Abstract

Background The World Health Organization (WHO) initiative to estimate the global burden of foodborne diseases established the Foodborne Diseases Burden Epidemiology Reference Group (FERG) in 2007. In addition to global and regional estimates, the initiative sought to promote actions at a national level. This involved capacity building through national foodborne disease burden studies, and encouragement of the use of burden information in setting evidence-informed policies. To address these objectives a FERG Country Studies Task Force was established and has developed a suite of tools and resources to facilitate national burden of foodborne disease studies. This paper describes the process and lessons learned during the conduct of pilot country studies under the WHO FERG initiative. Findings Pilot country studies were initiated in Albania, Japan and Thailand in 2011 and in Uganda in 2012. A brief description of each study is provided. The major scientific issue is a lack of data, particularly in relation to disease etiology, and attribution of disease burden to foodborne transmission. Situation analysis, knowledge translation, and risk communication to achieve evidence-informed policies require specialist expertise and resources. Conclusions The FERG global and regional burden estimates will greatly enhance the ability of individual countries to fill data gaps and generate national estimates to support efforts to reduce the burden of foodborne disease.

References

7