Journal of Climate · 2002 · 81 citations · 18 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesEnvironmental SciencesAtmospheric ScienceClimate ScienceClimatologyClimate ChangeClimate ProjectionsGlobal WarmingGreenhouse EffectRadiative ForcingAerosol Forcing ProjectionsAerosol Radiative ForcingClimate Scenario AnalysisEmission Scenario ProjectionsEmissions ScenariosGaseous EmissionsGreenhouse Gas Emissions Scenario AnalysisGreenhouse Gas Scenario Analysis
Projections of future warming in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment Report (TAR) are substantially larger than those in the Second Assessment Report (SAR). The reasons for these differences are documented and quantified. Differences are divided into differences in the emissions scenarios and differences in the science (gas cycle, forcing, and climate models). The main source of emissions-related differences in warming is aerosol forcing, primarily due to large differences in SO2 emissions between the SAR and TAR scenarios. For any given emissions scenario, concentration projections based on SAR and TAR science are similar, except for methane at high emissions levels where TAR science leads to substantially lower concentrations. The new (TAR) science leads to slightly lower total forcing and slightly larger warming. At the low end of the warming range the effects of the new science and the new emissions scenarios are roughly equal. At the high end, TAR science has a smaller effect and the main reason for larger TAR warming is the use of a different high-end emissions scenario, primarily changes in SO2 emissions.
18
Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases
D. H. Ehhalt, Michael J. Prather, Frank Dentener et al. · Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) · 2001 · 780 citations · Full text
Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations
Warren M. Washington, John W. Weatherly, Gerald A. Meehl et al. · Climate Dynamics · 2000 · 654 citations