Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume · 1985 · 129 citations · 11 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryBone GraftingJoint Replacement SurgeryOrthopedicsAseptic LooseningImplant FixationKnee ArthroplastyRevision ArthroplastyRevision Joint ReplacementBone-cementum InterfaceBone-implant InterfaceCemented Revision ArthroplastyConstrained Revision ImplantsFemoral LooseningPrimary Knee ArthroplastyRevision Arthroplasty For LooseningRevision Knee Arthroplasty
Fifty-three failed knee replacements were revised using minimally constrained implants with smooth uncemented intramedullary stems and metal-backed tibial components. Polymethylmethacrylate was used only to replace lost bone near the surface of the implant. Excluding four knees which had serious postoperative complications, 91% had successful relief of pain, 84% had over 90 degrees of movement and 80% could walk for more than 30 minutes. Review of the radiographs showed that there were no progressive lucencies at the interface between bone and cement, and no subsidence of components or changes in alignment. At the uncemented stem-to-bone interface, thin white lines developed near the metal, and their significance is discussed. This revision technique is an effective treatment for aseptic failure of primary total knee arthroplasty.
11
Fixation of tibial components of knee prostheses.
P. S. Walker, D Greene, Donald T. Reilly et al. · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 1981 · 135 citations