Publication | Closed Access
Is the Moratorium Over? African American Psychology Professionals’ Views on Intelligence Testing in Response to Changes to Federal Policy
19
Citations
35
References
2011
Year
Forensic PsychologyDisabilityEducationResearch EthicsDevelopmental DisabilitiesPsychologyProgram EvaluationSocial SciencesRaceLearning Disability AssessmentIntellectual ImpairmentExceptional ChildrenAfrican American StudiesInclusive EducationIntelligence TestingChild AssessmentPsychological EvaluationExceptional ChildDevelopmental DisabilitySchool PsychologyEducational TestingChild DevelopmentFederal PolicySpecial Education PlacementPediatricsHuman-like IntelligenceIntelligence AnalysisSpecial Education
Collectively, advocates for the well-being of African American children have long called for a moratorium on the use of intelligence testing for the placement of children in special education. With the 2004 reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, intelligence testing is no longer required and in some states prohibited as a tool for assessing learning disabilities. As such, the purpose of this descriptive study is to give an overview of these changes and how they will affect the assessment of African American children. A national sample of African American psychology professionals was surveyed, and the majority indicated that response to intervention (RTI) methodologies alone are not sufficient for special education placement. In addition, there was uncertainty if RTI procedures will reduce African American disproportionality in special education. Results are discussed in terms of the need to increase the number of intervention articles that include African American children and recruiting more African American school psychologists.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1