Indigenous Psychologies

David Y. F. Ho

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · 1998 · 175 citations · 11 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The case for indigenization rests on the idea that conceptualizing psychological phenomena is itself a psychological phenomenon that can be investigated. The author constructs a metatheory of cross‑cultural comparisons to clarify arguments for and against indigenization and introduces methodological relationalism as an Asian‑origin framework toward universal psychology. Methodological relationalism, an Asian‑origin conceptual framework, is explicated to advance a universal psychology. The metatheory demonstrates that indigenous psychologies are a subdomain of cross‑cultural psychology and that Filipino and Confucian heritage theories offer conceptual and methodological contributions.

Abstract

To clarify the arguments for and against indigenization, the author constructs a metatheory of cross-cultural comparisons between theories, theorists, and cultures. This metatheory makes clear that cross-cultural psychology encompasses both indigenous and exotic theories; accordingly, indigenous psychologies may be regarded as a subdomain of cross-cultural psychology. The case for indigenization rests on acknowledging a critical point: The conceptualization of psychological phenomena is a psychological phenomenon in itself and is, therefore, subject to investigation. Illustrations are provided on how indigenous theorizing derived from Filipino and Confucian heritage cultures makes a conceptual and methodological contribution. To go beyond indigenization, methodological relationalism is explicated as a conceptual framework originating from Asia toward the realization of a universal psychology.

References

11