SSRN Electronic Journal · 2007 · 77 citations · 31 references
A higher profit‑elasticity value signals more intense competition. The authors introduce a new competition metric: the elasticity of a firm’s profits with respect to its cost level. Using firm‑level data, they compare this profit‑elasticity measure with the price‑cost margin. The profit‑elasticity and price‑cost margin are highly correlated on average, yet the latter misrepresents competition dynamics in highly concentrated, policy‑relevant markets, whereas the former remains reliable, making it a more trustworthy metric.
We introduce a new measure of competition: the elasticity of a firm’s profits with respect to its cost level. A higher value of this profit elasticity (PE) signals more intense competi- tion. Using firm-level data we compare PE with the most popular competition measures such as the price cost margin (PCM). We show that PE and PCM are highly correlated on average. However, PCM tends to misrepresent the development of competition over time in markets with few firms and high concentration, i.e. in markets with high policy relevance. So, just when it is needed the most PCM fails whereas PE does not. From this we conclude that PE is a more reliable measure of competition.
31
The Competitive Advantage of Nations
Terry Clark, Michael Porter · Journal of Marketing · 1991 · 17.7K citations
Global Production Network, Multinational Enterprise, Internationalization +19
Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance.
H. Michael Mann, F. M. Scherer · The Journal of Finance · 1971 · 6.4K citations
Game Theory, Law, Antitrust +18
Theory of Industrial Organization.
Ariel Rubinstein, Jean Tirole · Economica · 1989 · 5.4K citations
Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium
Steven Berry, James Levinsohn, Ariel Pakes · Econometrica · 1995 · 5K citations
Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance
F. M. Scherer, David Gaddis Ross · 1990 · 2.6K citations
Trade, Law, Market Design +21