International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing · 2003 · 80 citations · 18 references
EngineeringSystems EngineeringPerformance AssessmentProcess ControlProcess Systems EngineeringControl SystemsController DesignFeedback ControlProcess IdentificationProcess Performance MeasurementSystem IdentificationProcess Control LoopsSimulation StudiesStep ResponseStep Response AnalysisStep Test Assessment
Abstract In this paper, a pragmatic approach to process modelling and control loop performance assessment is proposed. We consider the following practical scenarios: the control loop of concern is operated by a simple controller such as PI/PID controller; a simple open‐loop/closed‐loop step response data is available or an open‐loop/closed‐loop step test can be readily performed; the control loop may be subject to significant disturbances and/or measurement noises. Our objectives are: (1) to estimate a continuous‐time process model from the step response data; (2) to assess control loop performance with a pragmatic benchmark in terms of both output performance and input variation, and identify practically attainable control loop performance. We will summarize the theory and algorithms developed for such a relatively comprehensive analysis. A number of simulation studies are presented to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed methodology. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
18
Computer-controlled systems: Theory and design
C.R. Johnson · Automatica · 1985 · 2.4K citations
Jan G. De Gooijer · International Journal of Forecasting · 1990 · 2.3K citations
Identification and control — Closed-loop issues
Paul M.J. Van den Hof, Ruud J.P. Schrama · Automatica · 1995 · 434 citations