Publication | Closed Access
A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom
156
Citations
4
References
2006
Year
Virtual EnvironmentsVle ManagementInstitutional CollaborationSupport ActivitiesLongitudinal PerspectiveEducationUnited KingdomStudent OutcomeLearning Management SystemVirtual RealityManagementHigher Education PolicyUniversity Student RetentionVirtual ClassroomVirtual Learning EnvironmentsLearning AnalyticsHigher Education InstitutionsHigher Education ManagementHigher EducationVirtual OrganizationVirtual EnterpriseVirtual CampusLearning Management Systems
Surveys by UCISA and JISC from 2001–2005, along with other studies, documented the acquisition, use, management, and support of Virtual Learning Environments in UK higher education. This evidence enables an analysis of the factors that promote or hinder the adoption and support of VLEs across UK institutions. The study finds that VLE usage is rising, yet pedagogic practices remain largely unchanged; management has become more centralized, with variations between older and newer universities and little interest in standards or collaboration.
Between 2001 and 2005 the Universities and Colleges Information Systems Association (UCISA) and the Joint Information Systems Council (JISC) conducted surveys into issues relating to the acquisition, use, management, and support of Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs). A number of other studies provide information on these issues during this period. Together they provide a substantial body of evidence that allows an analysis of the factors that enhance or inhibit institutional take-up and support provision for VLEs within the UK higher education sector. There is clear evidence of increasing use of VLEs but not of widespread change in pedagogic practice. VLE management is increasingly centralized in all matters considered strategic, with dedicated devolvement occurring for a range of support activities. Differences in practice exist between old and new universities. There is in general negligible interest in standards or in institutional collaboration.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1