Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine · 2013 · 25 citations · 7 references
AgricultureNutritionNutritional SciencesClinical NutritionGeriatric AssessmentNutrition In Older AdultsMalnutritionNutrition AssessmentNutrition Status EvaluationNutritional AssessmentNutritional Status AssessmentStrokeClinical Nutrition Outcome AssessmentGeriatric Nutrition AssessmentMalnutrition DiagnosisMalnutrition In Older AdultsNutritional Adequacy AssessmentNutritional Status ClassificationNutritional Status EvaluationNutritional Status Indicators
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of the subjective assessments of nutritional status (Mini-Nutritional Assessment [MNA] and scored patient-generated subjective global assessment [PG-SGA]), compared with the objective (hematological, biochemical, and anthropometric) assessments, and to identify the correlation between the MNA and the scored PG-SGA in elderly patients with stroke. METHODS: Thirty-five stroke patients, aged 60 to 89 years old, participated in our study. The MNA, the scored PG-SGA and objective factors were evaluated. The objective malnutrition state was defined based on laboratory outcomes. According to the MNA and the scored PG-SGA classifications, total patients were respectively divided into three groups; well-nourished (W), at risk of malnutrition (R), and malnourished (M), and into four groups; normally nourished (A), suspected or mildly malnourished (B), moderately malnourished (C), and severely malnourished (D). RESULTS: Mean age and body mass index of subjects were 70.6 years and 22.2 kg/m(2), respectively. Twenty-six (74.3%) patients were identified to be at an objectively malnourished state. In MNA, 3 (8.6%) patients were classified as group W, 13 (37.1%) as R, and 19 (54.3%) as M. Total MNA scores and three categorization had mild correlation with objective grouping (r=0.383, r=0.350, p<0.05, respectively). Restructuring into two groups by combining group R and M made strong correlation (r=0.520, p<0.01). On the basis of scored PG-SGA, 6 (17.1%) patients were sorted as group A, 10 (28.6%) as B, 15 (42.9%) as C, and 4 (11.4%) as D, respectively. Total scores and the grouping into four indicated meaningful correlation with the objective distinction (r=-0.403, p<0.05, r=0.449, p<0.01, respectively). There was a significant correlation between the MNA scores and the PG-SGA scores (r=-0.651, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: It is proposed that the MNA and the scored PG-SGA would be useful in screening malnourished elderly patients with stroke.
7
Johanna Jyrkkä, Hannes Enlund, Piia Lavikainen et al. · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · 2011 · 426 citations
Lisa Ha, Truls Hauge, Anne Bente Spenning et al. · Clinical Nutrition · 2010 · 152 citations