BMC Genomics · 2015 · 13 citations · 21 references
Life SciencesMolecular BiologyGene ExpressionGene Expression AnalysisTranscriptomicsComparative TranscriptomicsDifferential Gene Expression AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingTranscriptome AnnotationTranscriptomic AnalysisTranscriptomic ProfilingComparative EvaluationDynamic RangeExpression Platform ComparisonMicroarray AnalysisMicroarray-based TranscriptomicsReference Data SetsTranscriptome ComparisonTranscriptome Profiling
BACKGROUND: The arrival of RNA-seq as a high-throughput method competitive to the established microarray technologies has necessarily driven a need for comparative evaluation. To date, cross-platform comparisons of these technologies have been relatively few in number of platforms analyzed and were typically gene name annotation oriented. Here, we present a more extensive and yet precise assessment to elucidate differences and similarities in performance of numerous aspects including dynamic range, fidelity of raw signal and fold-change with sample titration, and concordance with qRT-PCR (TaqMan). To ensure that these results were not confounded by incompatible comparisons, we introduce the concept of probe mapping directed "transcript pattern". A transcript pattern identifies probe(set)s across platforms that target a common set of transcripts for a specific gene. Thus, three levels of data were examined: entire data sets, data derived from a subset of 15,442 RefSeq genes common across platforms, and data derived from the transcript pattern defined subset of 7,034 RefSeq genes. RESULTS: In general, there were substantial core similarities between all 6 platforms evaluated; but, to varying degrees, the two RNA-seq protocols outperformed three of the four microarray platforms in most categories. Notably, a fourth microarray platform, Agilent with a modified protocol, was comparable, or marginally superior, to the RNA-seq protocols within these same assessments, especially in regards to fold-change evaluation. Furthermore, these 3 platforms (Agilent and two RNA-seq methods) demonstrated over 80% fold-change concordance with the gold standard qRT-PCR (TaqMan). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that microarrays can perform on nearly equal footing with RNA-seq, in certain key features, specifically when the dynamic range is comparable. Furthermore, the concept of a transcript pattern has been introduced that may minimize potential confounding factors of multi-platform comparison and may be useful for similar evaluations.
21
BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Aaron R. Quinlan, Ira M. Hall · Bioinformatics · 2010 · 30.4K citations · Full text
HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data
Simon Anders, Paul Theodor Pyl, Wolfgang Huber · Bioinformatics · 2014 · 22.7K citations · Full text
DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data
Likun Wang, Zhixing Feng, Xi Wang et al. · Bioinformatics · 2009 · 4.9K citations · Full text