BMJ · 2011 · 100 citations · 24 references
Public HealthBiostatisticsClinical Classification SystemsClinical Decision SupportDiagnostic AssessmentDiagnostic ErrorDiagnostic EvaluationDiagnostic Test EvaluationDiagnosis VerificationDiagnostic Accuracy StudiesDiagnostic Model AnalysisDiagnostic TestingDiagnostic Testing AccuracyIndex TestPost-test ProbabilityReference Standard Comparison
Diagnostic accuracy studies compare an index test to a reference standard to estimate measures such as sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values, but incomplete or differential verification can bias these estimates and lead to costly or incorrect clinical decisions. This paper aims to describe the main types of disease verification problems and propose solutions to mitigate the resulting biases. The authors illustrate each verification problem with examples drawn from published diagnostic accuracy studies. Table 1 summarizes examples of diagnostic accuracy studies that exhibit verification problems.
The accuracy of a diagnostic test or combination of tests (such as in a diagnostic model) is the ability to correctly identify patients with or without the target disease. In studies of diagnostic accuracy, the results of the test or model under study are verified by comparing them with results of a reference standard, applied to the same patients, to verify disease status (see first panel in figure⇓).1 Measures such as predictive values, post-test probabilities, ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curves, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and odds ratios express how well the results of an index test agree with the outcome of the reference standard.2 Biased and exaggerated estimates of diagnostic accuracy can lead to inefficiencies in diagnostic testing in practice, unnecessary costs, and physicians making incorrect treatment decisions. Diagnostic accuracy studies with ( a ) complete verification by the same reference standard, ( b ) partial verification, or ( c )differential verification The reference standard ideally provides error-free classification of the disease outcome presence or absence. In some cases, it is not possible to verify the definitive presence or absence of disease in all patients with the (single) reference standard, which may result in bias. In this paper, we describe the most important types of disease verification problems using examples from published diagnostic accuracy studies. We also propose solutions to alleviate the associated biases. Often not all study subjects who undergo the index test receive the reference standard, leading to missing data on disease outcome (see middle panel in figure⇑). The bias associated with such situations of partial verification is known as partial verification bias, work-up bias, or referral bias.3 4 5 ### Clinical examples of partial verification Various mechanisms can lead to partial verification (see examples in table 1⇓). View this table: Table 1 Examples of diagnostic accuracy studies with problems in disease verification When the condition of interest … When the condition of interest …
24
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Subir Ghosh, Roderick J. A. Little, Donald B. Rubin · Technometrics · 1988 · 3.1K citations
Value of the Ventilation/Perfusion Scan in Acute Pulmonary Embolism
JAMA · 1990 · 2.7K citations
Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests
Jeroen G. Lijmer · JAMA · 1999 · 1.8K citations