Breast Cancer Research · 2008 · 129 citations · 40 references
Life SciencesCancer BiologyOncologyGene ExpressionMolecular OncologyTranscriptomicsCancer BiomarkersCancer GenomicsCancer TranscriptomicsExpression Signature DiscoveryFunctional Enrichment AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingEnrichment AnalysisExpression SignaturesGene Expression SignaturesPredictive PerformancePrognostic Expression SignaturesPrognostic Gene SignaturesPrognostic Signature DevelopmentTranscriptional Signature Analysis
INTRODUCTION: Several gene expression signatures have been proposed and demonstrated to be predictive of outcome in breast cancer. In the present article we address the following issues: Do these signatures perform similarly? Are there (common) molecular processes reported by these signatures? Can better prognostic predictors be constructed based on these identified molecular processes? METHODS: We performed a comprehensive analysis of the performance of nine gene expression signatures on seven different breast cancer datasets. To better characterize the functional processes associated with these signatures, we enlarged each signature by including all probes with a significant correlation to at least one of the genes in the original signature. The enrichment of functional groups was assessed using four ontology databases. RESULTS: The classification performance of the nine gene expression signatures is very similar in terms of assigning a sample to either a poor outcome group or a good outcome group. Nevertheless the concordance in classification at the sample level is low, with only 50% of the breast cancer samples classified in the same outcome group by all classifiers. The predictive accuracy decreases with the number of poor outcome assignments given to a sample. The best classification performance was obtained for the group of patients with only good outcome assignments. Enrichment analysis of the enlarged signatures revealed 11 functional modules with prognostic ability. The combination of the RNA-splicing and immune modules resulted in a classifier with high prognostic performance on an independent validation set. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that the nine signatures perform similarly but exhibit a large degree of discordance in prognostic group assignment. Functional analyses indicate that proliferation is a common cellular process, but that other functional categories are also enriched and show independent prognostic ability. We provide new evidence of the potentially promising prognostic impact of immunity and RNA-splicing processes in breast cancer.
40
KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Hiroyuki Ogata, Susumu Goto, Kazushige Sato et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 1999 · 32.4K citations · Full text
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
Laura van ‘t Veer, Hongyue Dai, Marc J. van de Vijver et al. · Nature · 2002 · 9.6K citations · Full text
A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer
Marc J. van de Vijver, Yudong D. He, Laura van ‘t Veer et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2002 · 6.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Bioinformatics, Oncology +17
Type, Density, and Location of Immune Cells Within Human Colorectal Tumors Predict Clinical Outcome
Jérôme Galon, Anne Costes, Fátima Sánchez‐Cabo et al. · Science · 2006 · 6.5K citations
Medicine, Immunology, Oncology +17