International Journal of Epidemiology · 1980 · 205 citations · 5 references
Public HealthBiostatisticsEpidemiologic MethodsEpidemiologyHealth Technology AssessmentAnalytic EpidemiologyCausal Effect EstimationCounterfactual AnalysisStudy DesignConfoundingConfounding AdjustmentConfounding BiasConfounding ControlResidual ConfoundingStatistical Model SelectionStepwise RegressionSubject Matter Knowledge
Greenland S (Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA) and Neutra R. Control of confounding in the assessment of medical technology. International Journal of Epidemiology 1980, 9: 361–367. Separation of the effects of extraneous variables from the effects of a factor under study (often termed control of confounding) is one of the key prerequisites for validly estimating the magnitude of the study factor's effects. Because of the phenomenon of confounding by indication, confounding of effects of different factors is a common problem in the assessment of medical technology. We give several examples illustrating that the decision of whether a recorded variable is a confounder in a data-set must be decided on the basis of subject-matter knowledge and clinical judgement. There is no alternative to use of such judgement; statistical selection procedures based on significance tests, such as stepwise regression, can be particularly misleading.
5
Logic of Statistical Inference.
A. P. Dempster, Ian Hacking · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1966 · 616 citations
STRATIFICATION BY A MULTIVARIATE CONFOUNDER SCORE
Olli S. Miettinen · American Journal of Epidemiology · 1976 · 351 citations
STANDARDIZATION OF RISK RATIOS
Olli S. Miettinen · American Journal of Epidemiology · 1972 · 220 citations
Public Health, Preventive Medicine, Epidemiologic Methods +9
Effect of Fetal Monitoring on Neonatal Death Rates
Raymond Neutra, Stephen E. Fienberg, Sander Greenland et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1978 · 95 citations