Cognitive Foundations of Arithmetic: Evolution and Ontogenisis

Susan Carey

Mind & Language · 2001 · 267 citations · 23 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Dehaene proposes a naturalistic view that the analog magnitude number line system underlies the evolutionary and ontogenetic foundations of numerical concepts. I support Dehaene’s view but argue that analog magnitude representations are unlikely to form the ontogenetic basis for natural number representation, instead favoring object‑file systems that support explicit integer lists.

Abstract

Dehaene (this volume) articulates a naturalistic approach to the cognitive foundations of mathematics. Further, he argues that the ‘number line’ (analog magnitude) system of representation is the evolutionary and ontogenetic foundation of numerical concepts. Here I endorse Dehaene’s naturalistic stance and also his characterization of analog magnitude number representations. Although analog magnitude representations are part of the evolutionary foundations of numerical concepts, I argue that they are unlikely to be part of the ontogenetic foundations of the capacity to represent natural number. Rather, the developmental source of explicit integer list representations of number are more likely to be systems such as the object–file representations that articulate mid–level object based attention, systems that build parallel representations of small sets of individuals.

References

23