Acta Informatica Medica · 2008 · 500 citations · 13 references
MedicineClinical SciencesClinical MedicineEvidence-based PracticeProblem-based LearningClinical Decision-makingClinical ReasoningEvidence EvaluationEvidence-based MedicineMedical EvidenceEvidence-based Decision Making
Evidence‑based medicine (EBM) is a lifelong, patient‑centered approach that integrates clinical experience, patient values, and the highest quality research to guide decision‑making, distinguishing itself from traditional practice by demanding superior evidence. The movement seeks to embed high‑quality clinical research into routine decision‑making by encouraging clinicians to use evidence summaries, contribute to systematic reviews and guidelines, and enroll patients in research. Clinicians must acquire efficient literature‑searching skills and apply formal evidence‑evaluation rules to assess and synthesize research for practice. EBM’s key accomplishment is the creation of systematic reviews and meta‑analyses that aggregate and critically evaluate multiple studies to produce the best available evidence.
NONE DECLARED Evidence based medicine (EBM) is the conscientious, explicit, judicious and reasonable use of modern, best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. EBM integrates clinical experience and patient values with the best available research information. It is a movement which aims to increase the use of high quality clinical research in clinical decision making. EBM requires new skills of the clinician, including efficient literature-searching, and the application of formal rules of evidence in evaluating the clinical literature. The practice of evidence-based medicine is a process of lifelong, self-directed, problem-based learning in which caring for one's own patients creates the need for clinically important information about diagnosis, prognosis, therapy and other clinical and health care issues. It is not "cookbook" with recipes, but its good application brings cost-effective and better health care. The key difference between evidence-based medicine and traditional medicine is not that EBM considers the evidence while the latter does not. Both take evidence into account; however, EBM demands better evidence than has traditionally been used. One of the greatest achievements of evidence-based medicine has been the development of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, methods by which researchers identify multiple studies on a topic, separate the best ones and then critically analyze them to come up with a summary of the best available evidence. The EBM-oriented clinicians of tomorrow have three tasks: a) to use evidence summaries in clinical practice; b) to help develop and update selected systematic reviews or evidence-based guidelines in their area of expertise; and c) to enrol patients in studies of treatment, diagnosis and prognosis on which medical practice is based.
13
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
David L. Sackett, William Rosenberg, J. A. Muir Gray et al. · BMJ · 1996 · 15.7K citations · Full text
Gordon Guyatt · JAMA · 1992 · 4.2K citations
Evidence-Based Medicine: A Unified Approach
David M. Eddy · Health Affairs · 2005 · 421 citations
Evidence-Based Medicine : How to Practice and Teach
D L Sackett · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 2000 · 236 citations