How Do We Justify Knowledge Produced Within Interpretive Approaches?

Jörgen Sandberg

Organizational Research Methods · 2004 · 588 citations · 71 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Interpretive approaches in management and organizational sciences have grown rapidly, yet criteria for justifying their research outcomes have not kept pace. This article investigates whether common criteria can be applied to justify knowledge produced by interpretive methods. An interpretive study of competence in organizations is employed to illustrate how the proposed criteria and strategy can be operationalized. The study identifies suitable criteria and proposes a strategy for achieving them.

Abstract

The use of interpretive approaches within management and organizational sciences has increased substantially. However, appropriate criteria for justifying research results from interpretive approaches have not developed so rapidly alongside their adaptation. This article examines the potential of common criteria for justifying knowledge produced within interpretive approaches. Based on this investigation, appropriate criteria are identified and a strategy for achieving them is proposed. Finally, an interpretive study of competence in organizations is used to demonstrate how the proposed criteria and strategy can be applied to justify knowledge produced within interpretive approaches.

References

71