Indigenous Community-based Language Education in the USA

Teresa L. McCarty, Lucille J. Watahomigie

Language Culture and Curriculum · 1998 · 80 citations · 13 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Nearly two million Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians across 500 tribes speak 175 languages, yet federal policies aimed at eradicating these languages have caused widespread loss, sociocultural dislocation, and poor outcomes in English‑only schools. The authors contend that indigenous language education must be historically contextualized as both an affirmation of self‑determination and a resistance to linguistic oppression. By drawing on published accounts and first‑hand testimony, they present case studies that show how community‑based language programs strengthen languages and advance language and education rights. Their analysis highlights ongoing challenges, the promise and limits of these initiatives, and their potential as catalysts for linguistic self‑determination and educational reform.

Abstract

Nearly two million American Indians, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians reside in the USA, representing over 500 tribes and 175 distinct languages. The uniqueness of tribal communities notwithstanding, all indigenous peoples in the USA share a history as the targets of federal policies aimed at eradicating their languages and lifeways. The legacy of those policies has been Native language loss and sociocultural dislocation, even as indigenous students have experienced considerable failure in English-only schools. Here, we argue that indigenous language education must be historically situated and as such, viewed as both an affirmation of self-determination and an act of resistance to linguistic oppression. Drawing on published accounts and first-hand testimony, we present several cases that illustrate the role of indigenous language education programmes in strengthening indigenous languages and promoting indigenous language and education rights. We conclude with an analysis of the continuing problems these community-based initiatives face, their promise and limitations as agents of language renewal, and their role as catalysts for linguistic self-determination and educational reform.

References

13