Publication | Closed Access
The Underlying Markov Decision Process in the Single-Leg Airline Yield-Management Problem
195
Citations
12
References
1999
Year
Mathematical ProgrammingEngineeringAirport ManagementInventory TheoryPricingAir Transport SystemOperations ResearchYield ManagementSingle-leg ProblemLogisticsSystems EngineeringCombinatorial OptimizationDecision TheoryStochastic DynamicQuantitative ManagementUnderlying Dynamic ProgramDynamic PricingFleet ManagementSupply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementAir Traffic ManagementQueueing SystemsRevenue ManagementBusinessDynamic ProgrammingDecision ScienceOmnibus FormulationDynamic Optimization
The single‑leg airline yield‑management problem is traditionally approached either dynamically, allowing simultaneous booking of multiple fare classes, or statically, assuming fare‑class demands arrive in a predetermined order.
We introduce the terms dynamic and static, respectively, to identify the prevailing approaches to the single-leg airline yield-management problem: those allowing customers of different fare classes to book concomitantly (dynamic), and those assuming that the demands for the different fare classes arrive separately in a predetermined order (static). We present a coherent frame-work linking these seemingly disparate models through the underlying dynamic program common to both. We develop a discrete-time Markov decision process formulation mirroring that of Janakiram et al. Transp. Sci. 33, 147–167 (1999) to solve the single-leg problem without cancellations, overbooking, or discounting. Borrowing a result from the queueing-control literature, we prove the concavity of the associated optimal value functions and, subsequently, the optimality of a booking limit policy. We then apply this same technique to the more influential papers from the single-leg literature, at once unifying the static and dynamic models and establishing the connection between the yield-management and queueing-control problems. Finally, we propose an omnibus formulation that yields the static and dynamic models as special cases.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1