ACM Transactions on Graphics · 2014 · 171 citations · 35 references
ComputingComputer Science3D ModelingComputational GeometryGeometric ModelingGeometry ProcessingMappingShape AnalysisShape RepresentationAlgorithmic Geometry ProcessingConsistencyMap ConsistencyShape Correspondence
The construction of networks of maps among shapes in a collection enables a variety of applications in data-driven geometry processing. A key task in network construction is to make the maps consistent with each other. This consistency constraint, when properly defined, leads not only to a concise representation of such networks, but more importantly, it serves as a strong regularizer for correcting and improving noisy initial maps computed between pairs of shapes in isolation. Up-to-now, however, the consistency constraint has only been fully formulated for point-based maps or for shape collections that are fully similar. In this paper, we introduce a framework for computing consistent functional maps within heterogeneous shape collections. In such collections not all shapes share the same structure --- different types of shared structure may be present within different (but possibly overlapping) sub-collections. Unlike point-based maps, functional maps can encode similarities at multiple levels of detail (points or parts), and thus are particularly suitable for coping with such diversity within a shape collection. We show how to rigorously formulate the consistency constraint in the functional map setting. The formulation leads to a powerful tool for computing consistent functional maps, and also for discovering shared structures, such as meaningful shape parts. We also show how to adapt the procedure for handling very large-scale shape collections. Experimental results on benchmark datasets show that the proposed framework significantly improves upon state-of-the-art data-driven techniques. We demonstrate the usefulness of the framework in shape co-segmentation and various shape exploration tasks.
35
Robust principal component analysis?
Emmanuel J. Candès, Xiaodong Li, Yi Ma et al. · Journal of the ACM · 2011 · 6.9K citations
Robert Osada, Thomas Funkhouser, Bernard Chazelle et al. · ACM Transactions on Graphics · 2002 · 1.7K citations
Rick Szeliski, Ramin Zabih, Daniel Scharstein et al. · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2008 · 981 citations · Full text