Automated identification of stratifying signatures in cellular subpopulations

Robert V. Bruggner, Bernd Bodenmiller, David L. Dill, Robert Tibshirani, Garry P. Nolan

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2014 · 513 citations · 29 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Single‑cell technologies such as flow and mass cytometry generate high‑dimensional phenotypic data, yet few scalable methods exist to identify biologically relevant subpopulations. The authors introduce Citrus, a data‑driven approach to identify cell subsets linked to an experimental endpoint. Citrus tests hypotheses by clustering cells and associating subsets with outcomes, exemplified by detecting stimulus‑responsive blood cells and T‑cell subsets predicting AIDS‑free survival. Using Citrus, the authors identified blood cells responsive to stimuli and T‑cell subsets whose abundance predicts AIDS‑free survival in HIV patients.

Abstract

Significance Single-cell measurement technologies such as flow cytometry permit the investigation of specific cellular subpopulations. Mass cytometry currently measures >40 parameters per cell and produces phenotypically rich datasets that may be retrospectively interrogated for relevant biological signal. There are few methods that identify experimentally relevant subpopulations within these datasets, and most do not scale well to higher-dimensional measurements. To address this bottleneck, we present a data-driven method termed Citrus that identifies cell subsets associated with an experimental endpoint of interest. Citrus can test diverse experimental hypotheses and is demonstrated through the systematic identification of ( i ) blood cells that signal in response to experimental stimuli and ( ii ) T-cell subsets whose abundance is predictive of AIDS-free survival risk in patients with HIV.

References

29