Publication | Closed Access
Practical robust localization over large-scale 802.11 wireless networks
720
Citations
46
References
2004
Year
Unknown Venue
Standard 802.11Accurate LocalizationEngineeringRf LocalizationData ScienceLocation EstimationLocation AwarenessWearable TechnologyComputer EngineeringPractical Robust LocalizationMobile ComputingComputer ScienceLocalization TechniqueLocalization ResultsLocalizationSignal ProcessingIndoor Positioning System
We demonstrate a system built using probabilistic techniques that allows for remarkably accurate localization across our entire office building using nothing more than the built-in signal intensity meter supplied by standard 802.11 cards. While prior systems have required significant investments of human labor to build a detailed signal map, we can train our system by spending less than one minute per office or region, walking around with a laptop and recording the observed signal intensities of our building's unmodified base stations. We actually collected over two minutes of data per office or region, about 28 man-hours of effort. Using less than half of this data to train the localizer, we can localize a user to the precise, correct location in over 95% of our attempts, across the entire building. Even in the most pathological cases, we almost never localize a user any more distant than to the neighboring office. A user can obtain this level of accuracy with only two or three signal intensity measurements, allowing for a high frame rate of localization results. Furthermore, with a brief calibration period, our system can be adapted to work with previously unknown user hardware. We present results demonstrating the robustness of our system against a variety of untrained time-varying phenomena, including the presence or absence of people in the building across the day. Our system is sufficiently robust to enable a variety of location-aware applications without requiring special-purpose hardware or complicated training and calibration procedures.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
2002 | 8.3K | |
2000 | 5.4K | |
1992 | 3.8K | |
2000 | 3.7K | |
2000 | 3.6K | |
2000 | 3.2K | |
2000 | 3.1K | |
2001 | 3K | |
2001 | 2.7K | |
2003 | 2.6K |
Page 1
Page 1