Journal of Applied Social Psychology · 2013 · 139 citations · 124 references
Social PsychologySelf-assessmentJob Applicant RoleOrganizational BehaviorSocial SciencesPsychologyEmployee AttitudeBiasSelf-report StudySocial IdentityBehavioral SciencesMotivationApplied Social PsychologySelf‐presentation StyleCulturePersonality PsychologyPerformance StudiesInterpersonal CommunicationInterpersonal RelationshipsArtsNarcissism AdvantageJob InterviewsPersonality Science
Abstract Chronic self‐promoter s may thrive in job interviews where such behavior is encouraged. In Study 1, 72 participants were videotaped as they simulated the job applicant role. Accountability was manipulated by the expectation of expert versus nonexpert interviewers. As accountability increased, self‐promotion tended to decrease among non‐narcissists but increase among narcissists. Ingratiation showed no interaction or main effects. In Study 2, 222 raters evaluated applicant videos varying in narcissism (high vs. low) and ethnicity ( E uropean heritage vs. E ast A sian heritage). Chronic self‐promoters (i.e., E uropean‐heritage narcissists) were given the most positive evaluations. Detailed behavior analyses indicated that the narcissism advantage was derived primarily from frequent self‐praise and the E uropean‐heritage advantage from use of active ingratiation tactics. In sum, self‐presentation styles that pay off in the ( W estern) interview context are highly selective.
124
Susan T. Fiske, Amy J. C. Cuddy, Peter Glick et al. · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2002 · 6.5K citations