Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Transporters of arsenite in rice and their role in arsenic accumulation in rice grain

1.4K

Citations

27

References

2008

Year

TLDR

Arsenic poisoning affects millions worldwide, and rice efficiently accumulates arsenic from paddy soils, yet the underlying mechanism remains unclear. The study aims to identify the transporters responsible for moving arsenite from the soil into the rice xylem. Rice NIP aquaporins, specifically Lsi1 (OsNIP2;1) and Lsi2, are permeable to arsenite but not arsenate, and mutations in these transporters markedly reduce arsenite uptake and grain accumulation. Loss of Lsi2 dramatically lowers arsenic levels in shoots and grain, demonstrating that arsenite uses the silicon transport pathway and offering a target for reducing grain arsenic to improve food safety.

Abstract

Arsenic poisoning affects millions of people worldwide. Human arsenic intake from rice consumption can be substantial because rice is particularly efficient in assimilating arsenic from paddy soils, although the mechanism has not been elucidated. Here we report that two different types of transporters mediate transport of arsenite, the predominant form of arsenic in paddy soil, from the external medium to the xylem. Transporters belonging to the NIP subfamily of aquaporins in rice are permeable to arsenite but not to arsenate. Mutation in OsNIP2;1 (Lsi1, a silicon influx transporter) significantly decreases arsenite uptake. Furthermore, in the rice mutants defective in the silicon efflux transporter Lsi2, arsenite transport to the xylem and accumulation in shoots and grain decreased greatly. Mutation in Lsi2 had a much greater impact on arsenic accumulation in shoots and grain in field-grown rice than Lsi1. Arsenite transport in rice roots therefore shares the same highly efficient pathway as silicon, which explains why rice is efficient in arsenic accumulation. Our results provide insight into the uptake mechanism of arsenite in rice and strategies for reducing arsenic accumulation in grain for enhanced food safety.

References

YearCitations

1992

2K

2002

1.6K

2006

1.6K

2002

1.2K

2002

1K

2007

889

2005

794

2007

765

2006

708

2005

619

Page 1