PLoS ONE · 2007 · 72 citations · 28 references
MedicineVision ScienceSpatial VisionVisual NeuroscienceVisual PerceptionCross-modal Sensory InteractionsMultisensory IntegrationObject RecognitionTactile PerceptionThree-dimensional PerceptionCross-modal Object RecognitionCross-modal Sensory PerceptionCrossmodal PerceptionForced-choice RecognitionMultisensory Object RecognitionObject Orientation DependenceObjectsTactile Object Recognition
BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that visual and haptic object recognition are viewpoint-dependent both within- and cross-modally. However, this conclusion may not be generally valid as it was reached using objects oriented along their extended y-axis, resulting in differential surface processing in vision and touch. In the present study, we removed this differential by presenting objects along the z-axis, thus making all object surfaces more equally available to vision and touch. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Participants studied previously unfamiliar objects, in groups of four, using either vision or touch. Subsequently, they performed a four-alternative forced-choice object identification task with the studied objects presented in both unrotated and rotated (180 degrees about the x-, y-, and z-axes) orientations. Rotation impaired within-modal recognition accuracy in both vision and touch, but not cross-modal recognition accuracy. Within-modally, visual recognition accuracy was reduced by rotation about the x- and y-axes more than the z-axis, whilst haptic recognition was equally affected by rotation about all three axes. Cross-modal (but not within-modal) accuracy correlated with spatial (but not object) imagery scores. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The viewpoint-independence of cross-modal object identification points to its mediation by a high-level abstract representation. The correlation between spatial imagery scores and cross-modal performance suggest that construction of this high-level representation is linked to the ability to perform spatial transformations. Within-modal viewpoint-dependence appears to have a different basis in vision than in touch, possibly due to surface occlusion being important in vision but not touch.
28
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Irving Biederman · Psychological Review · 1987 · 5.6K citations
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Maximilian Riesenhuber, Tomaso Poggio · Nature Neuroscience · 1999 · 3.4K citations
Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys
Nikos K. Logothetis, J Pauls, Tomaso Poggio · Current Biology · 1995 · 980 citations · Full text
Medicine, Neurobiology, Neuroscience +14