Publication | Closed Access
The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust
1K
Citations
29
References
2005
Year
Public OpinionPolitical BehaviorCommunicationSocial SciencesPolite ExpressionPolitical SciencePolitical CommunicationPublic SphereNew VideomalaiseTelevision StudyTrustGovernment TransparencyGovernment CommunicationPolitical DisagreementTelevisionPolitical AttitudesArtsPersuasionDoes IncivilityPublic Debate
Incivility in political discourse may harm public regard for politics, but the mechanisms remain unclear. The study tests whether televised political disagreement violates social norms and affects political attitudes. The authors argue that incivility violates polite norms, thereby eroding trust in government. Three experiments show that while televised political disagreement does not harm attitudes toward politics, higher incivility reduces political trust, indicating that television’s format boosts interest but erodes trust.
Does incivility in political discourse have adverse effects on public regard for politics? If so, why? In this study we present a theory suggesting that when viewers are exposed to televised political disagreement, it often violates well-established face-to-face social norms for the polite expression of opposing views. As a result, incivility in public discourse adversely affects trust in government. Drawing on three laboratory experiments, we find that televised presentations of political differences of opinion do not, in and of themselves, harm attitudes toward politics and politicians. However, political trust is adversely affected by levels of incivility in these exchanges. Our findings suggest that the format of much political television effectively promotes viewer interest, but at the expense of political trust.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
1997 | 4.9K | |
2000 | 2K | |
1998 | 1.5K | |
2003 | 810 | |
1993 | 701 | |
1999 | 359 | |
1985 | 349 | |
1999 | 343 | |
1999 | 311 | |
2000 | 278 |
Page 1
Page 1