PLoS ONE · 2013 · 116 citations · 24 references
Life SciencesEntomologyBiological ControlInsect EcologyVector-borne Disease ControlInsecticide ResistanceMosquito BiologyMosquito ControlMosquito-borne DiseasesAnopheles Mosquito BiologyAttractive Toxic Sugar BaitsBioassay DevelopmentInsect RepellentsInsecticide MixturesMosquito Feeding BehaviorMosquito-borne Disease ControlMosquitocidal Bioassays
BACKGROUND: Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) sprayed onto vegetation has been successful in controlling Anopheles mosquitoes outdoors. Indoor application of ATSB has yet to be explored. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ATSB stations positioned indoors have the potential to kill host-seeking mosquitoes and constitute a new approach to control of mosquito-borne diseases. METHODS: Insecticides were mixed with dyed sugar solution and tested as toxic baits against Anopheles arabiensis, An. Gambiae s.s. and Culex quinquefasciatus in feeding bioassay tests to identify suitable attractant-insecticide combinations. The most promising ATSB candidates were then trialed in experimental huts in Moshi, Tanzania. ATSB stations were hung in huts next to untreated mosquito nets occupied by human volunteers. The proportions of mosquitoes killed in huts with ATSB treatments relative to huts with non-insecticide control treatments huts were recorded, noting evidence of dye in mosquito abdomens. RESULTS: In feeding bioassays, chlorfenapyr 0.5% v/v, boric acid 2% w/v, and tolfenpyrad 1% v/v, mixed in a guava juice-based bait, each killed more than 90% of pyrethroid-susceptible An. Gambiae s.s. and pyrethroid-resistant An. arabiensis and Cx. quinquefasciatus. In the hut trial, mortality rates of the three ATSB treatments ranged from 41-48% against An. arabiensis and 36-43% against Cx. quinquefasciatus and all were significantly greater than the control mortalities: 18% for An. arabiensis, 7% for Cx. quinquefasciatus (p<0.05). Mortality rates with ATSB were comparable to those with long lasting insecticidal nets previously tested against the same species in this area. CONCLUSIONS: Indoor ATSB shows promise as a supplement to mosquito nets for controlling mosquitoes. Indoor ATSB constitute a novel application method for insecticide classes that act as stomach poisons and have not hitherto been exploited for mosquito control. Combined with LLIN, indoor use of ATSB has the potential to serve as a strategy for managing insecticide resistance.
24
Raphaël N’Guessan, Vincent Corbel, Martin Akogbéto et al. · Emerging infectious diseases · 2007 · 571 citations · Full text
Rousseau F Djouaka, Adekunle A. Bakare, Ousmane N Coulibaly et al. · BMC Genomics · 2008 · 344 citations · Full text
Alternative insecticides: an urgent need
Morteza Zaim, Pierre Guillet · Trends in Parasitology · 2002 · 285 citations
Günter C. Müller, John C. Beier, Sékou F. Traorè et al. · Malaria Journal · 2010 · 245 citations · Full text