Tracing Textual Poachers: Reflections on the development of fan studies and digital fandom

Lucy Bennett

The Journal of Fandom Studies · 2014 · 92 citations · 39 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Henry Jenkins’ 1992 book *Textual Poachers* sparked the fan studies field and reshaped restrictive views of media fans. The article traces Jenkins’ influence on the author’s scholarship and evaluates the evolution of fan studies since the book, reflecting on technology, methods, and fan‑text relations. The author examines the field by reviewing its current state, technological and social media developments, methodological shifts, and fan‑text dynamics. Technological advances have reshaped communication, creativity, knowledge, and organizational/civic power in fandom, and *Textual Poachers* serves as a benchmark revealing the field’s significant progress.

Abstract

Abstract In 1992 Henry Jenkins’ influential work, Textual Poachers, was published, which contributed towards igniting the establishment of the fan studies field of research and re-morphing previous restrictive depictions of media fans. This article traces the work’s influence on my own steps as an early career researcher in the field and how it shaped my ideas and approach to scholarship. Speaking more broadly, it assesses the current state of the fan studies field, and how things have developed since Jenkins’ text was released. I reflect on what general fluxes, concerns and dimensions are currently with us, through a lens of the themes raised in Textual Poachers, most especially surrounding the development of technology and social media, methods in the field and fans’ relations with texts, assessing to what degree we have moved forward, or remained in stasis within fan studies scholarship. This study argues that technological advances have impacted on and shaped four key, often interconnected, areas of fandom and enquiry: (1) communication, (2) creativity, (3) knowledge and (4) organizational and civic power. Overall, this article shows how Textual Poachers is an invaluable source to measure the field and landscape of fandom, and determine the extent to which it has seemingly leaped forward.

References

39