Comparison of Predictors for High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women with Abnormal Smears

Anne Szarewski, Laurence Ambroisine, Louise Cadman, Janet Austin, Linda Ho, George Terry, Stuart Liddle, Roberto Dina, Julie McCarthy, Hilary Buckley,

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2008 · 229 citations · 18 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Abstract

273 (28.6%) women had high-grade disease (CIN2+) on worst histology, with 193 (20.2%) having CIN3+. For the detection of CIN2+, Hybrid Capture II had a sensitivity of 99.6%, specificity of 28.4%, and PPV of 36.1%. Amplicor had a sensitivity of 98.9%, specificity of 21.7%, and PPV of 33.5%. PreTect HPV-Proofer had a sensitivity of 73.6%, specificity of 73.1%, and PPV of 52.0%. APTIMA had a sensitivity of 95.2%, specificity of 42.2%, and PPV of 39.9%. CINtec p16INK4a Cytology had a sensitivity of 83.0%, specificity of 68.7%, and PPV of 52.3%. Linear Array had a sensitivity of 98.2%, specificity of 32.8%, and PPV of 37.7%. Clinical-Arrays had a sensitivity of 80.9%, specificity of 37.1%, and PPV of 33.0%.

References

18