Annals of Internal Medicine · 2011 · 14K citations · 9 references
NursingDiagnostic SciencesDiagnostic AssessmentDiagnostic ImagingHealth AssessmentDiagnostic CriteriaDiagnostic EvaluationDiagnostic Test EvaluationDiagnostic Test SelectionQuality MeasurementSystematic ReviewAnecdotal EvidenceBias In Systematic ReviewsDiagnostic Accuracy StudiesDiagnostic Quality MeasurementDiagnostic Quality MetricsIndex TestQuality AssessmentReference Standard Construction
In 2003, the QUADAS tool for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies was developed. Experience, anecdotal reports, and feedback suggested areas for improvement; therefore, QUADAS-2 was developed. This tool comprises 4 domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Each domain is assessed in terms of risk of bias, and the first 3 domains are also assessed in terms of concerns regarding applicability. Signalling questions are included to help judge risk of bias. The QUADAS-2 tool is applied in 4 phases: summarize the review question, tailor the tool and produce review-specific guidance, construct a flow diagram for the primary study, and judge bias and applicability. This tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies.
9
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Julian P. T. Higgins, Doug Altman, Peter C Gøtzsche et al. · BMJ · 2011 · 34.2K citations · Full text
Penny Whiting, Anne WS Rutjes, Johannes B. Reitsma et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2003 · 3.6K citations · Full text
The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis
Peter Jüni · JAMA · 1999 · 2K citations
Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests
Jeroen G. Lijmer · JAMA · 1999 · 1.8K citations
Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz, Iveta Simera et al. · PLoS Medicine · 2010 · 1.5K citations · Full text