Fighting collusion by regulating communication between firms

Kai Uwe Kühn

Economic Policy · 2001 · 163 citations · 12 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Collusion among firms is a persistent antitrust problem, and regulating inter‑firm communication is a key strategy to curb it. The study proposes that collusion should be combated mainly by restricting specific types of inter‑firm communication that are most likely to enable collusion. The authors identify communication forms that pose high anti‑competitive risk yet would not cause significant efficiency losses if prohibited. The analysis yields straightforward rules for regulating inter‑firm communication that can inform competition policy for B2B electronic marketplaces. Author: Kai‑Uwe Kühn.

Abstract

Fighting collusion Regulation of communication between firms This paper is an attempt to create a coherent approach to the design of competition policy enforcement against collusion based on theoretical considerations, evidence from economic experiments, and case studies. I argue that collusion should primarily be fought indirectly by targeting types of communication between firms that are particularly likely to facilitate collusion. In particular, I identify types of communication which have high potential anti‐competitive effects but where it is unlikely that prohibiting communication will lead to efficiency losses. This analysis leads to some simple rules concerning communication between firms, which could also guide the development of competition rules for B2B electronic market places. — Kai-Uwe Kühn

References

12