Strategic Management Journal · 2004 · 624 citations · 45 references
BusinessStrategic ManagementStrategyBusiness StrategyCorporate StrategyIndustrial OrganizationCorporate DiversificationEconomic DiversificationEconomies Of ScopeFirm CapabilitiesTemporal DiversificationUnrelated DiversificationCorporate Unrelated DiversificationIndustrial DiversificationIndustry DiversificationModular StructureModularityRelated Diversification
Debate persists over whether firms create value beyond individual businesses, with related diversification often justified by intra‑temporal economies of scope from shared resources. This paper investigates inter‑temporal economies of scope achieved by reallocating resources between related businesses as firms exit and enter markets. Inter‑temporal economies arise from resource transfers during market exits and are enhanced by a decentralized, modular organizational structure. The study shows that modularity and recombination enable inter‑temporal economies of scope, meaning related diversification can be effective without extensive coordination among units. © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Abstract The question of whether corporations add value beyond that created by individual businesses has engendered much debate in recent years. Some of this debate has focused on the pros and cons of related vs. unrelated diversification. A standard explanation of the benefits of related diversification has to do with the ability to obtain intra‐temporal economies of scope from contemporaneous sharing of resources by related businesses within the firm. In contrast, this paper deals with inter‐temporal economies of scope that firms achieve by redeploying resources and capabilities between related businesses over time, as firms exit some markets while entering others. The transfer of resources due to market exit distinguishes our treatment of inter‐temporal economies of scope from standard intra‐temporal economies of scope. In addition, these inter‐temporal economies can benefit from a decentralized and modular organizational structure. This ability to obtain inter‐temporal economies of scope via organizational modularity and recombination suggests that corporations do not necessarily need a high degree of coordination between business units in order to benefit from a strategy of related diversification. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
45
A resource‐based view of the firm
Birger Wernerfelt · Strategic Management Journal · 1984 · 24.8K citations · Full text
Dynamic capabilities: what are they?
Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Jeffrey A. Martin · Strategic Management Journal · 2000 · 14.4K citations · Full text
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.
D. O’Brien, Oliver E. Williamson · The Economic Journal · 1976 · 13.8K citations