Discourse Studies · 2013 · 56 citations · 34 references
Language StudiesSpanishDiscourse AnalysisRhetoricRhetorical StudiesAcademic DiscourseCorpus-based Discourse AnalysisGenre AnalysisGenre-based Stylistic ComparisonSpanish Discourse AnalysisCorpus-based Genre AnalysisDisciplinary RhetoricDisciplinary VariationGenre-based OrganizationKnowledge ConstructionRhetorical MovesRhetorical OrganizationSpecialized Discourse Analysis
Few studies have examined the rhetorical organization of textbook genres and the frequency of macro‑moves, moves, and steps across disciplines, a gap this study addresses with a qualitative‑quantitative approach. The study aims to fill this research gap by determining and comparing the frequency of macro‑moves, moves, and steps in 126 Spanish university textbooks across four disciplines. The authors analyzed 126 textbooks, categorizing them by major knowledge areas—Basic Sciences and Engineering versus Social Sciences and Humanities—and by specific disciplines: Social Work, Psychology, Industrial Chemistry, and Construction Engineering. The analysis revealed that the frequency of certain discourse moves and steps varies across disciplines, indicating that knowledge construction in textbooks differs and that disciplinarity shapes diverse organizational patterns.
Not many studies have focused on the analysis of the rhetorical organization of a genre and the respective frequency of occurrence of moves and steps as they occur in a corpus across disciplines – particularly, with a complementary qualitative-quantitative approach. This article aims to become a step in helping to fill this gap in research on Spanish. In this way, the textbook genre, the occurrence of its rhetorical macro-moves, moves and steps and disciplinarity are the central focus of this study. More specifically, in this article we seek to determine and to compare the frequency of occurrence of macro-moves, moves and steps in a corpus of 126 university textbooks across the academic discourse of four disciplines. We distinguish the major areas of knowledge (Basic Sciences and Engineering and Social Sciences and Humanities) as well as the specific disciplines (Social Work, Psychology, Industrial Chemistry and Construction Engineering). The main findings show there are differences between the occurrence of some discourse moves and steps across the texts of disciplines under study, which reveals a distinctive feature in the didactic component of textbooks. So we can infer that knowledge construction process through this genre is not carried out in the same way and that disciplinarity plays an important role in the diversifying organizational discourse patterns detected.
34
<i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</i>
Thomas Kühn, Richard Schlegel · Physics Today · 1963 · 35.5K citations
Humanities, History, Physics +17
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
David Böhm, Thomas Kühn · The Philosophical Quarterly · 1964 · 9.2K citations
Strategies of Discourse Comprehension
John J. Staczek, Teun A. van Dijk, Walter Kintsch · Modern Language Journal · 1985 · 5.5K citations
Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings
Mark O. James, John M. Swales · Modern Language Journal · 1992 · 4.7K citations