Vehicle detection and tracking using acoustic and video sensors

Rama Chellappa, Gang Qian, Qinfen Zheng

2004 · 96 citations · 5 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Multimodal sensing, combining video and acoustic sensors, has gained attention for diverse tasks such as target detection, tracking, and activity understanding in surveillance. The study proposes a fusion framework that integrates video and acoustic sensors for vehicle detection and tracking. The framework first estimates target direction‑of‑arrival from acoustic beamforming, uses this to locate the target in video, refines the estimate with video‑based moving‑target detection, and then applies Markov chain Monte Carlo for joint audio‑visual tracking, with experiments on synthetic and real data. The fusion approach, which combines audio and visual trackers via their empirical posterior probability densities, yields improved vehicle tracking performance compared to separate modalities.

Abstract

Multimodal sensing has attracted much attention in solving a wide range of problems, including target detection, tracking, classification, activity understanding, speech recognition, etc. In surveillance applications, different types of sensors, such as video and acoustic sensors, provide distinct observations of ongoing activities. We present a fusion framework using both video and acoustic sensors for vehicle detection and tracking. In the detection phase, a rough estimate of target direction-of-arrival (DOA) is first obtained using acoustic data through beam-forming techniques. This initial DOA estimate designates the approximate target location in video. Given the initial target position, the DOA is refined by moving target detection using the video data. Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques are then used for joint audio-visual tracking. A novel fusion approach has been proposed for tracking, based on different characteristics of audio and visual trackers. Experimental results using both synthetic and real data are presented. Improved tracking performance has been observed by fusing the empirical posterior probability density functions obtained using both types of sensors.

References

5