British Journal of Addiction · 1988 · 79 citations · 23 references
EducationPsychiatryBehavioral HealthPsychotherapySubstance Use DisordersAlcohol DependenceAlcohol Use DisorderAlcohol Use ReductionCognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychosocial InterventionsRelapse PreventionAlcohol Dependence TreatmentAlcohol Use Disorder TreatmentsCognitive Coping SkillsDrinking CessationInterpersonal Process GroupsRelapse Prevention GroupsRelapse To Alcohol UseSelf-help For Alcohol Reduction
Aftercare improves drinking outcomes, yet its maintenance phase has been under‑investigated as an intervention target. The study evaluated the effects of cognitive‑behavioural relapse prevention and interpersonal process aftercare groups on recently hospitalized alcoholics. Participants (N = 39) received eight weekly 90‑minute sessions in either RP or IP groups, with assessments at pretreatment, post‑treatment, and 6‑month follow‑up. Both RP and IP groups showed comparable improvements in drinking outcomes, coping, and aftercare attendance; secondary analyses linked temptation reduction to RP and behavioural coping to IP, but no significant differential effects were found, likely due to limited power, ceiling effects, short follow‑up, and treatment similarity, prompting recommendations for future research.
Summary Aftercare contributes to improved drinking outcome, yet maintenance has been overlooked as a point for intervention. This project evaluated the effect of cognitive‐behavioural relapse prevention (RP) and interpersonal process (IP) aftercare groups for recently hospitalized alcoholics, consisting of eight weekly 90 min sessions delivered by three co‐therapy teams conducting one group in each condition. Six cohorts of patients were assigned to conditions (N=39) and assessed at pretreatment, post‐treatment, and 6 month follow‐up. RP and IP resulted in comparable improvement/outcome on alcohol consumption, alcohol‐related impairment, cognitive coping, drinking days, time to first drink, abstinence, and aftercare attendance. In secondary analyses, improvement on temptation was attributed to RP, on behavioural coping to IP, and effects on self‐efficacy appeared marginally related to greater short term improvement for RP. The lack of differential outcome is discussed with respect to inadequate power, possible ceiling effects in outcome, the brevity of the follow‐up period, and the possibility that treatments may have been more similar in implementation than intended. Suggestions for improving aftercare and relapse prevention research are presented.
23
Behavioral Medicine: Changing- Health Lifestyles
David F. Colvin · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · 1980 · 803 citations