Protein Science · 2001 · 156 citations · 44 references
Natural SciencesBiochemistryBiophysicsBiophysical ChemistryProtein BiochemistrySurface ScienceBiomolecular InterfacesPartition CoefficientProtein AdsorptionProtein StructureSolvation EffectsSolvation TheoryBovine Serum AlbuminProtein - Water InteractionsProtein SolvationProtein-surface InteractionsSolute Concentration EffectsSurface Properties Of ProteinsThermodynamic ForcesThermodynamic Surfaces
To interpret effects of urea and guanidinium (GuH(+)) salts on processes that involve large changes in protein water-accessible surface area (ASA), and to predict these effects from structural information, a thermodynamic characterization of the interactions of these solutes with different types of protein surface is required. In the present work we quantify the interactions of urea, GuHCl, GuHSCN, and, for comparison, KCl with native bovine serum albumin (BSA) surface, using vapor pressure osmometry (VPO) to obtain preferential interaction coefficients (Gamma(mu3)) as functions of nondenaturing concentrations of these solutes (0-1 molal). From analysis of Gamma(mu3) using the local-bulk domain model, we obtain concentration-independent partition coefficients K(nat)(P) that characterize the accumulation of these solutes near native protein (BSA) surface: K(nat)(P,urea)= 1.10 +/- 0.04, K(nat)(P,SCN(-)) = 2.4 +/- 0.2, K(nat)(P,GuH(+)) = 1.60 +/- 0.08, relative to K(nat)(P,K(+)) identical with 1 and K(nat)(P,Cl(-)) = 1.0 +/- 0.08. The relative magnitudes of K(nat)(P) are consistent with the relative effectiveness of these solutes as perturbants of protein processes. From a comparison of partition coefficients for these solutes and native surface (K(nat)(P)) with those determined by us previously for unfolded protein and alanine-based peptide surface K(unf)(P), we dissect K(P) into contributions from polar peptide backbone and other types of protein surface. For globular protein-urea interactions, we find K(nat)(P,urea) = K(unf)(P,urea). We propose that this equality arises because polar peptide backbone is the same fraction (0.13) of total ASA for both classes of surface. The analysis presented here quantifies and provides a physical basis for understanding Hofmeister effects of salt ions and the effects of uncharged solutes on protein processes in terms of K(P) and the change in protein ASA.
44
Crystal structure of human serum albumin at 2.5 Å resolution
Shigetoshi Sugio, Akiko Kashima, Shota Mochizuki et al. · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · 1999 · 1.8K citations
Coupling of Local Folding to Site-Specific Binding of Proteins to DNA
Ruth S. Spolar, M. Thomas Record · Science · 1994 · 1.4K citations
How Hofmeister ion interactions affect protein stability
Robert L. Baldwin · Biophysical Journal · 1996 · 1.1K citations · Full text