Publication | Closed Access
Public Reporting On Quality In The United States And The United Kingdom
215
Citations
27
References
2003
Year
Comparative Health SystemsEngineeringHealth ReformUnited KingdomPublic RelationsUnited StatesQuality EvaluationHealth Care QualityJournalismPublic Health SystemQuality ReviewPublic HealthSurvey MethodologyHealth Services ResearchReliabilityPublic PolicyHealth PolicyHealth Information SystemOutcomes ResearchHealthcare QualityHealth SystemsQuality AssuranceHealth EconomicsHealth DataHealth Policy InitiativeGlobal HealthQuality CharacteristicComparative InformationPublic ReportingHealth Informatics
The public reporting of comparative information about health care quality is becoming an accepted way of improving accountability and quality. Quality report cards have been prominent in the United States for more than a decade and are a central feature of British health system reform. In this paper we examine the common challenges and differences in implementation of the policy in the two countries. We use this information to explore some key questions relating to the content, target audience, and use of published information. We end by making specific recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of public reporting.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
2000 | 835 | |
1995 | 820 | |
1998 | 389 | |
1996 | 366 | |
2002 | 300 | |
1995 | 240 | |
1998 | 222 | |
1998 | 219 | |
2002 | 144 | |
2001 | 141 |
Page 1
Page 1