Journal of Research in Science Teaching · 2000 · 140 citations · 33 references
EducationAstronomyScience EducationAstronomy EducationNature Of ScienceScience InstructionAstronomy InstructionExplanationScience PedagogyScientific EvidenceScientific InquiryScientific ReasoningExplanation In Science TeachingNature Of Science BeliefsNature Of Science ViewsScientific Argumentation InstructionScientific TeachingStudent Attitudes Toward AstronomyStudent Ideas
For decades, science education policy has urged teaching the nature of science, yet research on how students develop these understandings within specific courses remains scarce. This study investigates how students’ grasp of the nature of astronomy evolves during a single semester college course. Using work from 340 students and three‑time interviews of selected participants, the authors present class data and a detailed case study of five students’ conceptual development. Results show that instruction prompts students to demand evidence, integrate scientific and religious perspectives, and differentiate scientific from nonscientific theories. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc., J Res Sci Teach 37: 340–362.
Arguments for teaching about the nature of science have been made for several decades. The most recent science education policy documents continue to assert the need for students to understand the nature of science. However, little research actually explores how students develop these understandings in the context of a specific course. We examine the growth in students' understanding about the nature of astronomy in a one-semester college course. In addition to student work collected for 340 students in the course, we also interviewed focus students three times during the course. In this article we briefly describe class data and discuss in detail how five students developed their ideas throughout the course. In particular, we show the ways in which students respond to instruction with respect to the extent to which they (a) demand and examine evidence used for justifying claims, (b) integrate scientific and religious views, and (c) distinguish between scientific and nonscientific theories. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 37: 340–362, 2000.
33
<i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</i>
Thomas Kühn, Richard Schlegel · Physics Today · 1963 · 35.5K citations
Humanities, History, Physics +17
National Science Education Standards
James H. Shea · Journal of Geological Education · 1995 · 7.9K citations · Full text
Young People's Images of Science
Roger Hackett · Physics Education · 1996 · 915 citations
Children and adults as intuitive scientists.
Deanna Kuhn · Psychological Review · 1989 · 735 citations