Journal of Business Finance & Accounting · 2008 · 46 citations · 34 references
ManagementCorporate GovernanceAgency TheoryCorporate FinanceMergersBoard CompositionBoard OversightBoard StructureBoard-executive RelationsHostile TakeoversOwnership StructureBoard CharacteristicsDirector ReputationFailed Mergers
Abstract: This study examines factors that explain the turnover and board seats held by target firm directors post‐takeover. Following successful takeovers the proportion of the board replaced is lower when the target has better performance. In failed takeovers, executive directors have lower turnover and the rate of turnover is reduced after a hostile takeover. Inconsistent with ex‐post settling‐up, actions that advance target shareholder wealth during the takeover does not assist a director obtain an increase in future board seats. Confirming a reputation effect, directors with multiple directorships have a lower rate of turnover and a higher increase in future board seats.
34
A Survey of Corporate Governance
Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny · The Journal of Finance · 1997 · 16.2K citations · Full text
Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm
Eugene F. Fama · Journal of Political Economy · 1980 · 10.6K citations
Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?
Eliezer M. Fich, Anil Shivdasani · The Journal of Finance · 2006 · 1.7K citations · Full text
Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders
Stuart C. Gilson · Journal of Financial Economics · 1990 · 1.1K citations
Law, Banking Law, Finance +10