The role of the state in economic growth

Erik S. Reinert

Journal of Economic Studies · 1999 · 206 citations · 26 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Since the Renaissance, the state has been tasked with creating well‑functioning markets by providing legal frameworks, standards, credit, infrastructure, and acting as an entrepreneur of last resort, a role early economists recognized as essential for national markets and highlighted by mercantilist economics to extend city synergies to the nation‑state. The paper traces and describes the state’s role in promoting economic growth in Western societies since the Renaissance, arguing that Anglo‑Saxon economics fails to capture these issues and instead examines the state’s role in non‑equilibrium traditions. The authors analyze the state’s role by critiquing Anglo‑Saxon economics and incorporating non‑equilibrium economic traditions that emphasize production and knowledge. The study concludes that the antagonism between state and market, characteristic of the twentieth century, is a relatively new phenomenon.

Abstract

This paper attempts to trace and describe the role played by the government sector – the state – in promoting economic growth in Western societies since the Renaissance. One important conclusion is that the antagonism between state and market, which has characterised the twentieth century, is a relatively new phenomenon. Since the Renaissance one very important task of the state has been to create well‐functioning markets by providing a legal framework, standards, credit, physical infrastructure and – if necessary – to function temporarily as an entrepreneur of last resort. Early economists were acutely aware that national markets did not occur spontaneously, and they used “modern” ideas like synergies, increasing returns, and innovation theory when arguing for the right kind of government policy. In fact, mercantilist economics saw it as a main task to extend the synergetic economic effects observed within cities to the territory of a nation‐state. The paper argues that the classical Anglo‐Saxon tradition in economics – fundamentally focused on barter and distribution, rather than on production and knowledge – systematically fails to grasp these wider issues in economic development, and it brings in and discusses the role played by the state in alternative traditions of non‐equilibrium economics.

References

26