IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development · 2013 · 261 citations · 130 references
Life SciencesAutonomous SystemsNeuroscienceArtificial IntelligenceCognitive NeuroscienceComputational NeuroscienceAgent-based ModelingAgent-based SimulationCognitive ArchitectureCognitive ModelingIntelligent AgentsLearning SystemsAction Selection ModelsAgent LearningAttentionCognitive AgentsCognitive Control ArchitectureCognitive Neuroscience ModelingLearningLearning Agents
LIDA is an empirically grounded cognitive architecture that integrates modules for motivation, emotion, attention, and autonomous learning, drawing on cognitive science and neuroscience. The paper presents LIDA, a learning intelligent distribution agent designed to emulate human experiments and perform real‑world tasks through attention, action selection, and human‑like learning. LIDA achieves this via sophisticated action selection, emotion‑driven motivation, a central attention mechanism, and multimodal instructionalist and selectionist learning, with nonlinear dynamics linking modules to neuroscience. Simulation results demonstrate that LIDA replicates known experimental data, validating its computational implementation.
We describe a cognitive architecture learning intelligent distribution agent (LIDA) that affords attention, action selection and human-like learning intended for use in controlling cognitive agents that replicate human experiments as well as performing real-world tasks. LIDA combines sophisticated action selection, motivation via emotions, a centrally important attention mechanism, and multimodal instructionalist and selectionist learning. Empirically grounded in cognitive science and cognitive neuroscience, the LIDA architecture employs a variety of modules and processes, each with its own effective representations and algorithms. LIDA has much to say about motivation, emotion, attention, and autonomous learning in cognitive agents. In this paper, we summarize the LIDA model together with its resulting agent architecture, describe its computational implementation, and discuss results of simulations that replicate known experimental data. We also discuss some of LIDA's conceptual modules, propose nonlinear dynamics as a bridge between LIDA's modules and processes and the underlying neuroscience, and point out some of the differences between LIDA and other cognitive architectures. Finally, we discuss how LIDA addresses some of the open issues in cognitive architecture research.
130
Gordon H. Bower · American Psychologist · 1981 · 5K citations
Choice Reviews Online · 1991 · 4.3K citations
Gordon H. Bower · American Psychologist · 1981 · 4.1K citations