American Journal of Therapeutics · 2015 · 11 citations · 43 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryElbow SurgeryMeta-analysisOrthopedicsDistal Humerus Fracture SurgeryFracture FixationFracture ManagementFracture-related InfectionNetwork Meta-analysisOutcome AssessmentCumulative Network Meta-analysisOptimal Treatment RegimesPlatingSurface Under The Cumulative Ranking Curve
To determinate the optimal treatment for distal radius fractures (DRF) by comparing the pin-track infection (PTI) rates in patients treated with 7 surgical techniques [bridging external fixation (EF), nonbridging EF, K-wire fixation, plaster fixation, dorsal plating, dorsal and volar plating, and volar plating]. After an exhaustive search of electronic databases for relevant published studies, high-quality randomized controlled trails were selected for the present network meta-analysis based on predefined selection criteria. Statistical analyses of the extracted data were conducted using Stata 12.0 software. After careful selection, 19 randomized controlled trails were included in our network meta-analysis and contained a combined total of 1805 subjects who underwent various surgical procedures. The network meta-analysis results showed that compared with bridging EF for treating DRF, the nonbridging EF, plaster fixation, volar plating, and dorsal and volar plating showed statistically significant differences in PTI rates. Importantly, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve values of the surgical interventions revealed that the PTI rates of plaster fixation and of dorsal and volar plating were the lowest, suggesting that these 2 surgical techniques are optimal for DRFs treatment, compared with the other methods. Our results suggest that plaster fixation and dorsal and volar plating are the best surgical treatments for DRFs compared with 5 other most common techniques. Thus, plaster fixation and dorsal and volar plating emerge as the most effective and credible treatments in consideration of PTI rates.
43
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider et al. · BMJ · 1997 · 56.3K citations
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Julian P. T. Higgins, Doug Altman, Peter C Gøtzsche et al. · BMJ · 2011 · 34.2K citations · Full text
Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA
Anna Chaimani, Julian P. T. Higgins, Dimitris Mavridis et al. · PLoS ONE · 2013 · 2.4K citations · Full text
Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis
Jaime Peters · JAMA · 2006 · 2.2K citations