The UN as a Human Rights Violator? Some Reflections on the United Nations Changing Human Rights Responsibilities

TLDR

Historically, the UN did not consider itself capable of violating human rights, but recent evolutions—such as expanding peace operations and territorial administration—have made such violations possible, reflecting its shift from an inter‑governmental body to a global governance actor. The article explores how the UN’s evolving mission may compel a reassessment of its human‑rights responsibilities. The UN’s expanding role—from peace operations to full territorial administration—illustrates its growing sovereign‑like functions. These expanded powers entail new responsibilities for the UN.

Abstract

This article attempts to explore how changes in the UN's mission may force it to rethink its responsibilities in terms of human rights. Until recently, the UN had never thought of itself as actually capable of violating human rights. But a number of evolutions have made this a possibility. Starting with peace operations and culminating with the international administration of entire territories, the UN is increasingly taking on sovereign-like functions. This evolution may be seen as a larger metaphor for what the UN is becoming, from a traditional inter-governmental organization to one increasingly entrusted with tasks of global governance. With these new powers, it would seem, come new responsibilities.