Safety and Health at Work · 2014 · 23 citations · 18 references
NursingOccupational Health NursingHealth AssessmentPsychometricsWorkplace Health AssessmentContent ValidityHealth-related Quality Of LifeHealth-related Quality Of Life MeasurementQuality Of LifeQuality Of Life AssessmentWork-based AssessmentContent Validity EvidenceCross-cultural Adaptation Of InstrumentsCross-cultural Scale ValidationIntraclass CorrelationOutcome Measurement In NursingRegistered NursesTest-retest ReliabilityTranslation Assessment Validity
BACKGROUND: Currently available questionnaires for evaluating the quality of worklife do not fully examine every factor related to worklife in all cultures. A tool in Thai is therefore needed for the direct evaluation of the quality of worklife. Our aim was to translate the Work-related Quality of Life Scale-2 (WRQLS-2) into Thai, to assess the validity and reliability of the Thai-translated version, and to examine the tool's accuracy vis-à-vis nursing in Thailand. METHODS: This was a descriptive correlation study. Forward and backward translations were performed to develop a Thai version of the WRQLS. Six nursing experts participated in assessing content validity and 374 registered nurses (RNs) participated in its testing. After a 2-week interval, 67 RNs were retested. Structural validity was examined using principal components analysis. The Cronbach's alpha values were calculated. The respective independent sample t test and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to analyze known-group validity and test-retest reliability. Multistate sampling was used to select 374 RNs from the In- and Outpatient Department of Srinagarind Hospital of the Khon Kaen University (Khon Kaen, Thailand). RESULTS: The content validity index of the scale was 0.97. Principal components analysis resulted in a seven-factor model, which explains 59% of the total variance. The overall Cronbach's alpha value was 0.925, whereas the subscales ranged between 0.67 and 0.82. In the assessment results, the known-group validity was established for the difference between civil servants and university employees [F (7.982, 0.005) and t (3.351; p < 0.05)]. Civil servants apparently had a better quality worklife, compared to university employees. Good test-retest reliability was observed (r = 0.892, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Thai version of a WRQLS appears to be well validated and practicable for determining the quality of the work-life among nurses in Thailand.
18
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Lee J. Cronbach · Psychometrika · 1951 · 43.2K citations · Full text
Social Sciences, Educational Assessment, Educational Measurement +14
Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity
Mary R. Lynn · Nursing Research · 1986 · 6.4K citations
Social Sciences, Educational Measurement, Method Validation +9
Psychiatric Morbidity in Older People with Moderate and Severe Learning Disability
Steve Moss, Pradip Patel, Helen Prosser et al. · The British Journal of Psychiatry · 1993 · 210 citations · Full text
Education, Psychiatry, Psychology +15