Publication | Closed Access
Incidental Acquisition of Word Meaning from Expositions with Varied Text Features
148
Citations
35
References
1987
Year
Text StructureEducationPsycholinguisticsLexical SemanticsSemanticsLanguage LearningApplied LinguisticsNatural Language ProcessingSecond Language AcquisitionReading ComprehensionComputational LinguisticsIncidental AcquisitionLanguage AcquisitionText VersionReadingLanguage StudiesLexiconLanguage-based ApproachCognitive ScienceComputational LexicologyVaried Text FeaturesAble StudentsDistributional SemanticsText FeaturesWord MeaningLanguage ComprehensionReading Comprehension StrategiesLinguistics
Three categories of text features—macrostructure, microstructure logical/temporal relations, and detailed explanations of concepts and their relations—have been identified as influencing comprehension. The study examined whether these text features affect incidental vocabulary acquisition during reading expositions. Researchers revised two natural expositions in three incremental steps to produce four versions each, identified the most difficult words, and had 309 eighth‑grade students read one version and complete a sensitive multiple‑choice test. Students, both able and less able, who read versions with thorough explanations of key concepts and their relations learned significantly more word meanings than those who read any other version.
THE AUTHORS investigated how text features may influence the amount of vocabulary knowledge acquired incidentally while reading expositions. Three sets of text features were identified from studies on comprehension: (a) features associated with the macrostructure, (b) features associated with logical and temporal relations in the microstructure, and (c) features associated with explanations of concepts and relations between them. Two natural expositions were revised in three successive, incremental steps, yielding four versions for each exposition. The most difficult words in each exposition were identified. Eighth-grade students (N = 309) read one text version and completed a multiple-choice test written to be sensitive to small gains in word knowledge. Both the able and the less able students who read versions in which key concepts and the relations between them had been explained thoroughly learned significantly more word meanings than students who read any of the other versions.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1