Publication | Open Access
Bacteriological Safety Assessment of Municipal Tap Water and Quality of Bottle Water in Dhaka City: Health Hazard Analysis
32
Citations
3
References
1970
Year
EngineeringPathogen DetectionBottle WaterWater Quality ManagementAntibiotic ResistanceMicrobial HazardEscherichia Coli SppEnvironmental MicrobiologyInfection ControlAntimicrobial ResistanceWaterborne DiseasesWater QualityFood SafetySanitationMicrobial ContaminationEnvironmental EngineeringMicrobiologyDhaka CityMedicineMunicipal Tap WaterMicrobial Risk Assessment
Bacteriological quality of treated water of different sources was determined by presumptive coliform count. In source-wise distribution of samples, 50% of mineral water, 87.5% of filtered water and 100% of tap water samples were exceeded the drinking water guideline value of WHO. Microorganisms in tap water comprised Escherichia coli spp. (60%), Klebsiella spp. (40%), Enterobacter spp. (20%), Pseudomonas spp. (70%), Proteus spp. (10%), Staphylococcus spp. (40%) and Salmonella spp. (0%). Furthermore, there was no correlation between faecal coliform and the presence of Salmonella species. Results obtained from this investigation revealed that municipal tap water of Dhaka city was contaminated with a number of enteric bacteria such as E. coli. This organism was considered as a good bioindicator model for surveillance studies of antimicrobial resistance. So, only antibiotic resistance pattern of E. coli was determined. A total of 10 E. coli isolates were used for the sensitivity test. All the isolates were totally resistant to Rifampin and Bacitracin (100%). Most of the isolates were found highly resistant to Tetracycline (90%) and Erythromycin (90%), moderately resistant to Amoxicillin (70%), Streptomycin (70%) and Novobiocin (60%). On the other hand, the isolates were totally sensitive to Gentamycin (100%) and Kanamycin (90%) and highly sensitive to Chloramphenicol (80%). Key words: Municipal tap water, Bacteriological safety assessment, Quality, Bottle water, Health hazard DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmm.v4i1.8462 BJMM 2011; 4(1): 9-13
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1