Meaning in the Context of Stress and Coping

TLDR

Existing research on meaning and meaning‑making is abundant but lacks systematic integration. The study aims to delineate meaning dimensions in stress, extend the transactional stress–coping model, and provide a framework for future research. The authors develop a two‑level meaning framework (global and situational), apply it to synthesize coping literature, define meaning‑making with a reappraisal focus, and outline attribution roles and future research implications.

Abstract

Although theoretical and empirical work on topics related to meaning and meaning making proliferate, careful evaluation and integration of this area have not been carried out. Toward this end, this article has 3 goals: (a) to elaborate the critical dimensions of meaning as it relates to stressful life events and conditions, (b) to extend the transactional model of stress and coping to include these dimensions, and (c) to provide a framework for understanding current research and directions for future research within this extended model. First, the authors present a framework for understanding diverse conceptual and operational definitions of meaning by distinguishing 2 levels of meaning, termed global meaning and situationalmeaning. Second, the authors use this framework to review and synthesize the literature on the functions of meaning in the coping process and propose a definition of meaningmaking that highlights the critical role of reappraisal. The authors specify the roles of attributions throughout the coping process and discuss implications for future research.